LIVE
Mr Vegas 9.2 PlayOJO 8.9 888 Casino 8.7 LeoVegas 8.5 Casumo 8.3
No UKGC · Informational review
sitelikeuk score
8.1/10

Lunar Bet Casino Review

Lunar Bet is best read as an inactive crypto casino case, not a current UK option. This opening checks the closure signal, Caacon Ltd link, Anjouan licensing context, historical crypto banking, bonus evidence, games and player-protection gaps. The article focuses on operator context around Caacon Ltd and the current evidence is mixed and needs status context. It is written as editorial information rather than a recommendation, so the useful details sit next to limitations, jurisdiction notes and practical checks a reader may want to make before trusting any offer or account claim.

It gives the reader clear facts first, cautious wording where public evidence is limited, no promotional push, and enough context to compare Lunar Bet with related brands or alternatives. The rest of the article expands on payment rules, bonus wording, game coverage, reputation signals, support routes and 18+ safer-gambling points.

Last reviewed: June 2026

How Lunar Bet’s offshore licence differs from a UK Gambling Commission licence

The evidence reviewed for Lunar Bet points to Anjouan licence source context rather than a UK Gambling Commission licence, but this article treats the licence position cautiously where first-party or register evidence is incomplete. Offshore licensing applies a different rule set from the UKGC, and UK readers do not get the protections that come with a UKGC-licensed account. The differences below are facts, not recommendations.

Observed operational differences, not recommendations:

  • Crypto deposits appear in the checked banking evidence (Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, DOGE)
  • Deposit methods checked: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Dogecoin
  • KYC and source-of-funds checks follow the operator/licence rules; where timing or document requirements are not evidenced, we do not assume they match UKGC checks
  • Bonus, account and complaint handling follow the named offshore evidence rather than UKGC affordability rules
Cons and player-protection gaps for UK readers:

  • No UK-wide self-exclusion participation
  • No IBAS dispute escalation
  • No UKGC affordability assessment
  • No UKGC complaint route
  • Deposit limits and account tools depend on the operator rules

Relationship and operator snapshot: Lunar Bet + related alternatives

Brand Relationship or regulator Evidence note
Lunar Bet Anjouan licence source Subject terms only where cited
Slotmonster Related/alternative Relationship label only
Jokabet Related/alternative Curacao licence certificate
NineCasino Related/alternative Relationship label only
FCMoon Related/alternative Relationship label only
Megapari Related/alternative Relationship label only

Details are shown only where the available evidence supports the claim. T&Cs apply, 18+, BeGambleAware.

Quick Verdict on Lunar Bet

This Lunar Bet review starts with the reputation issue, not the bonus headline: Casino Guru states Lunar Bet is closed, with the source checked on 2026-05-28. The Lunar Bet casino was a crypto-led gambling brand linked to Caacon Ltd, but UK readers should treat it as an inactive, outside-UKGC case study rather than a site to join.

The strongest historical draw was simple: crypto payments, a claimed sportsbook link, and a game list that included Pragmatic Play, Evolution Gaming, BGaming and Betsoft. The biggest drawback is larger. (press source)

Lunar Bet Key Facts

Area Lunar Bet details
Status Closed according to Casino Guru, checked 2026-05-28
Operator Caacon Ltd is named in the Lunar Bet casino evidence
Licence evidence Anjouan licensing claim; official Anjouan resources are the relevant regulator route (Anjouan licence source)
UK availability GB is treated as restricted for publication, and the brand is not safe to promote to UK users (Casino Guru source)
Historical payments Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether and Dogecoin were listed as deposit and withdrawal methods (Casino Guru source)
Welcome bonus No active UK-facing welcome bonus verified; a historical affiliate claim described a 150% first-deposit bonus (Casino Guru source)
Game evidence Providers listed include Evolution Gaming, Pragmatic Play, Igrosoft, Betsoft Gaming, BGaming and Endorphina (Casino Guru source)
Support Email listed as info@lunar.bet; Casino Guru records live chat as unavailable (press source)

Lunar Bet Licence, Offshore Status and UK Safety Overview

Licensing and Regulatory Standing

Lunar Bet homepage
Lunar Bet homepage capture used for visual context.

The Lunar Bet casino evidence points to Caacon Ltd and an Anjouan licensing claim, with press source as the relevant regulatory context. A Lunar press release also described the project as a registered and licensed crypto casino platform and named Slotegrator, CoinsPaid and BetBy partnerships, but that is historical product context rather than a current UK sign-up route.

For a UK reader, the practical point is plain. Lunar Bet sits outside the UKGC system. The UK-wide self-exclusion register also does not cover it. Those gaps are not benefits. They reduce the routes a player would normally expect when dealing with a UKGC-licensed operator. (Anjouan licence source)

Player Protection and Dispute Context

Anjouan responsible-gaming materials describe operator obligations around self-exclusion and limit tools, and Casino Guru lists responsible-gaming options for Lunar Bet. Because the brand is treated as closed, those tools should be read as historical or licence-context evidence, not as active account controls. UKGC brands usually carry stricter identity, affordability, source-of-funds and complaint obligations. Brands licensed elsewhere follow their own operator and regulator rules, so UK-equivalent KYC timing, withdrawal checks and dispute handling should not be assumed. (Casino Guru source)

Lunar Bet Welcome Bonus and Wagering Terms

The Lunar Bet review evidence does not support treating the Lunar Bet welcome bonus as a live UK offer. Casino Guru’s bonus page, checked on 2026-05-28, treats the brand as closed, while the older SisterSite page described a historical 150% first-deposit bonus with a 30x wagering requirement and a qualifying crypto deposit of 0.005 ETH; Casino Guru source. That older claim is useful for understanding what Lunar Bet was selling, not for presenting a current sign-up deal.

Offer Wagering Important restrictions Source context
Historical 150% first-deposit bonus (Casino Guru source) 30x (Casino Guru source) Qualifying deposit was described as 0.005 ETH; no current UK-facing bonus is supported by the status evidence (Casino Guru source) Casino Guru source, checked 2026-05-28
Current bonus page status Bonus page tied to closed-casino status The offer should not be framed as claimable for UK readers Casino Guru bonus page, checked 2026-05-28; Casino Guru source

Bonus Breakdown and Terms

The historical Lunar Bet bonus was simple on the surface: a 150% first-deposit match. The detail that matters is the 30x wagering requirement. That means the offer was not just a headline percentage; it came with play-through conditions before bonus-linked winnings could be treated as withdrawable. That detail is not strong enough in the cited record for a full comparison. (Casino Guru source)

The Lunar Bet casino was crypto-led, and the older bonus evidence names 0.005 ETH as the qualifying deposit point. Because the UK banking evidence says GBP is not applicable for this checked sources, the Lunar Bet minimum deposit should not be rewritten as a pound figure. That matters for readers comparing old Lunar Bet terms with UKGC-licensed casinos, where sterling deposits, card payments, and UK-facing bonus terms are normally clearer. (Casino Guru source)

Free Spins Terms and Conditions

The checked sources do not show a Lunar Bet free spins bundle attached to the historical welcome offer. There is also no supported spin value, expiry period for spins, eligible slot, or wagering rule for spin winnings. For this section, the honest reading is narrow: the Lunar Bet casino evidence supports a historical deposit-match bonus, not a free-spins-led welcome package. (Casino Guru source)

Is the Lunar Bet Welcome Bonus Worth Claiming?

For a current UK reader, this is not a claimable bonus discussion. Lunar Bet is treated as inactive in the status evidence, and the target-market evidence says UK promotion is unsafe because the brand has no UKGC authority and no current first-party UK acceptance evidence. The older 150% figure may look large, but headline size is the weakest part of bonus analysis. The 30x wagering requirement, crypto deposit framing, closed status, and lack of current UK eligibility evidence are the points that carry more weight. (Casino Guru source)

This Lunar Bet casino review therefore reads the bonus as history. It helps explain the product Lunar Bet tried to be: a crypto-first casino with a sizeable deposit-match hook. It does not support fresh bonus-code copy, promo-code copy, or any wording that asks a UK reader to join. (Casino Guru forum source)

Lunar Bet Bonus Code and Promo Code Notes

No Lunar Bet bonus code or Lunar Bet promo code is supported by the checked sources. The sources point to an old deposit-match offer and a closed-casino bonus page, not a live code mechanic. That also means a Lunar Bet no deposit bonus should not be described as available. The safer editorial line is to keep the Lunar Bet bonus discussion tied to the historical 150% offer and its 30x wagering term. (Casino Guru source)

Ongoing Promotions at Lunar Bet

The cited record is too thin to treat that point as established. The historical affiliate material described the site around crypto casino play, VIP language, and game access, but the status evidence changes how that should be used. A closed or inactive brand should not be written as though weekly reloads, tournaments, cashback, or seasonal offers are running today. (Casino Guru source)

There is one useful reader takeaway. If a player is comparing Lunar Bet alternatives, the promotion page should be checked for live terms, expiry dates, wagering, max bet rules, and withdrawal caps before the headline offer is given much weight. Lunar Bet shows why that matters: a bonus can remain visible in older write-ups long after the brand’s current availability has changed. (Casino Guru source)

Loyalty and VIP Terms

The Lunar Bet evidence includes historical VIP and programme references from SisterSite, but it does not give a reliable tier table, comp-point exchange rate, VIP-host rule, cashback percentage, or withdrawal-priority term. Those missing mechanics are important because loyalty schemes can sound more generous than they are. Without a tier structure and redemption rules, a VIP label tells the reader very little. (Casino Guru source)

For UK readers, the bigger issue is regulatory context. Lunar Bet was linked to Anjouan licensing resources and Caacon Ltd in the review evidence, while the brand is not presented as a UKGC-licensed casino. A loyalty scheme does not soften that difference. If anything, VIP and bonus systems need more scrutiny when the complaint route and safer-gambling obligations sit outside the UK framework. (Casino Guru source)

7. Lunar Bet Game Library

Slots and Providers

The Lunar Bet casino review evidence points to a crypto-led games lobby with a broad supplier list, not a small token-only side product. Casino Guru records providers including Evolution Gaming, Pragmatic Play, Igrosoft, Betsoft Gaming, BGaming, Endorphina, Tom Horn, Belatra Games, Betgames, Gamebeat, Platipus, Amigo Gaming, Caleta Gaming, Iconic21, Aviatrix, Gamzix, 3 Oaks Gaming, CT Interactive, Mascot Gaming, Triple Cherry, Vivo Gaming and PG Soft, checked on 2026-05-28 via Casino Guru.

The named Lunar Bet games in the evidence include Gates of Olympus, Sugar Rush, Curse of the Werewolf Megaways, Release the Kraken, Deepsea Riches and Zeus the Thunderer. That points towards a slots-heavy product with Pragmatic Play and modern video-slot content visible in the historical listing. The missing part is scale. There is no verified total game count or slot count, so this Lunar Bet review does not treat the library as larger than the evidence shows. (Casino Guru source)

Live Casino and Game Shows

Evolution Gaming and Vivo Gaming appear in the verified provider list, while SisterSite also names Mega Wheel and Sweet Bonanza Candyland among the visible titles checked on 2026-05-28 at Casino Guru source. Those titles suggest live casino and game-show content was part of the Lunar Bet casino product when the site was being tracked.

There is no verified live-dealer table count. There is also no current working lobby evidence because Casino Guru treats Lunar Bet as closed. So the fair reading is simple: Lunar Bet appears to have carried recognisable live casino suppliers and named game-show titles, but this is useful as historical product context, not a current reason to open an account. (Casino Guru source)

Table Games, Jackpots and Lobby Features

The checked sources do not name a progressive jackpot count or a dedicated table-game total. It does show a mix of slot studios, live suppliers and game-show titles, which is enough to describe Lunar Bet as more than a single-category crypto site. Lobby tools such as favourites, demo play, RTP display and autoplay settings are not evidenced for this review, so they are left out. (Casino Guru source)

8. Lunar Bet Sportsbook

Sports Markets and Betting Integration

Lunar Bet should not be described as casino-only. A 2024 company press release said the wider Lunar crypto gaming platform had BetBy sportsbook integration, alongside Slotegrator and CoinsPaid partnerships, checked on 2026-05-28 via press source. SisterSite also described sports betting historically.

The key limit is availability. The same subject evidence treats Lunar Bet as inactive now, so this sportsbook section is a record of what was claimed for the platform, not a current review of live markets, bet builder, cash out or in-play tools. No verified sport count, market count or live-betting depth is available in the checked sources, and this section does not invent one. (press source)

9. Lunar Bet Deposits and Withdrawals

Payment Methods and Limits

Lunar Bet banking was crypto-first. Casino Guru listed Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether and Dogecoin for deposits and withdrawals, checked on 2026-05-28 at Casino Guru source. The historical bonus evidence also mentioned 0.005 ETH as a qualifying deposit for the old welcome offer, checked on 2026-05-28 at Casino Guru source. That 0.005 ETH figure should not be treated as a general Lunar Bet minimum deposit.

Payment method Verified use Stated withdrawal time Player-reported withdrawal time Limits and notes
Bitcoin Historical deposits and withdrawals No verified current processing time No verified player-reported timing sample Casino Guru flagged a low daily withdrawal limit under $500 and a EUR 5,000 monthly withdrawal limit, checked on 2026-05-28; Casino Guru source.
Ethereum Historical deposits and withdrawals No verified current processing time No verified player-reported timing sample 0.005 ETH appears only as a historical welcome-bonus qualifying deposit. (Casino Guru source)
Tether Historical deposits and withdrawals No verified current processing time No verified player-reported timing sample Listed as USDT in the crypto asset evidence. (Casino Guru source)
Dogecoin Historical deposits and withdrawals No verified current processing time No verified player-reported timing sample Listed as DOGE in the crypto asset evidence. (Casino Guru source)

Withdrawal Speed and KYC Reality

The Lunar Bet withdrawal picture is thin in the area that matters most to players: actual payout timing. The evidence separates methods from speeds. It lists crypto rails and withdrawal limits, but it does not provide a verified stated Lunar Bet withdrawal time or a dated player-reported Lunar Bet payout sample. (Casino Guru source)

KYC should be read in the same careful way. UKGC-licensed brands usually carry stricter identity, affordability, source-of-funds and complaint obligations. Lunar Bet was presented as an Anjouan-licensed crypto gaming platform, so its checks would follow operator and licence rules rather than UKGC rules. The evidence does not name exact Lunar Bet KYC documents or a processing timeline. For a closed brand, that missing operational detail matters less than the bigger point: the payment routes are historical, and there is no current usable cashier evidence. (Casino Guru source)

Fees and Currency Considerations

The verified banking fields do not list Lunar Bet deposit fees or withdrawal fees. The useful currency detail is that this was a crypto cashier, not a GBP-led UK cashier. Casino Guru recorded BTC, ETH, USDT and DOGE, while the checked sources treat current crypto acceptance as historical because the casino is inactive. The practical limitation is clear: even where the old Lunar Bet casino supported crypto deposits and withdrawals, the current evidence does not support a live banking recommendation. (Casino Guru source)

What Real Players Say About Lunar Bet

Source Positive signals Complaint themes How to read it
Casino Guru bonus page, checked 2026-05-28 source; Casino Guru source Historical bonus records exist. (Casino Guru source) No active UK-facing welcome offer is supported by the evidence. Old Lunar Bet bonus claims should be read as archive material. (Casino Guru source)
Casino Guru forum index source There is public discussion around the brand. The indexed forum evidence includes a player-reported dead-site/payment issue. (Casino Guru source) One forum signal is not a full complaint sample, but it fits the wider inactive-site evidence. (Casino Guru source)
Blockspot listing source Shows the Lunar token and lunar.bet association. Reports lunar.bet offline since 2025-10-27. This supports the closure reading from Casino Guru.; checked on 2026-05-28; Casino Guru source

There is no strong public review base here. The clearest pattern is practical: the Lunar Bet casino was linked to crypto play, Anjouan licensing claims and a sportsbook partnership history, but the current reader risk is availability, not bonus value. (press source)

What Lunar Bet Gets Wrong

The biggest problem with Lunar Bet is simple. The evidence says it is closed. Casino Guru states that the casino no longer operates, and Blockspot reports lunar.bet offline since 2025-10-27. That makes the Lunar Bet review mostly an archive and safety check, not a live sign-up assessment, checked on 2026-05-28; Casino Guru source.

The second weakness is source conflict around the Lunar Bet licence. The brand was described in a 2024 press release as registered and licensed, with Anjouan context attached to the wider evidence set press release source. The official Anjouan register was also part of the verification trail Anjouan register.

Banking is another weak area. Historical records list Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether and Dogecoin deposits and withdrawals, but no player-reported Lunar Bet withdrawal time is available in the evidence. Casino Guru also flagged a low daily withdrawal limit and a EUR 5,000 monthly cap, checked on 2026-05-28; Casino Guru source. That is a serious limitation for anyone trying to understand Lunar Bet payout risk.

How to Compare Lunar Bet With UKGC-Licensed Alternatives

A named head-to-head would overstate the evidence. The available related-brand rows do not give enough licence, bonus, game, support and safer-gambling detail to declare a clean winner. Slotmonster, Jokabet, NineCasino, FCMoon and Megapari are only safe to describe here as related or comparison brands, not confirmed Lunar Bet sister sites. (Casino Guru source)

Jokabet has the most usable comparison data in the visible matrix. Its row lists jokabet.com, a Curacao certificate URL, 24/7 live chat, a £2 minimum deposit, a £50 minimum withdrawal, and payment options including Visa, Mastercard, bank transfer, Neteller, Skrill, MiFinity and several crypto assets. That makes it more concrete than the other related rows, but the same row does not give enough operator, game, bonus or safer-gambling evidence for a full verdict. (Casino Guru forum source)

For UK readers, the cleaner comparison is regulatory. A UKGC-licensed casino has UK complaint routes, stricter identity and affordability obligations, and connection to the national self-exclusion mechanism. Lunar Bet does not offer that UK framework in the evidence. Crypto access and looser international account rules may sound practical, but weaker UK recourse is a real trade-off. (Casino Guru source)

Lunar Bet Review Final Verdict

This Lunar Bet casino review lands on a closed-brand verdict. Lunar Bet was a crypto-led casino project linked with Caacon Ltd, Anjouan licensing claims, crypto payment methods, named providers such as Evolution Gaming and Pragmatic Play, and historical bonus claims. Those details are useful for understanding what Lunar Bet was trying to be. (Casino Guru source)

They are not enough to treat Lunar Bet as a current option. The closure evidence, low daily withdrawal-limit signal, thin public reputation sample and lack of UKGC protection all point the same way. The Lunar Bet review is most useful for readers checking old claims, old accounts, token links or related-brand mentions. Anyone comparing active casinos should use current licence, banking, KYC, withdrawal and complaint-route evidence before placing any money. Gambling is 18+. BeGambleAware, GamCare, Gambling Therapy and Gamblers Anonymous are free, confidential and independent sources of support. (Casino Guru forum source)

How to read this Lunar Bet review

Lunar Bet is assessed here as a consumer-information page rather than a sign-up prompt. That matters for offshore or thinly documented brands because the useful answer is rarely a simple score. A reader needs to know whether the operator identity is stable, which licence framework applies, what payment and bonus terms can be traced to a source, and what protection is missing compared with a UK Gambling Commission casino. (Casino Guru source)

The article therefore gives more weight to ownership, licence trail, UK availability, payment limits, KYC documents, complaint routes, and dated reputation samples than to broad marketing claims. If a public source gives a figure, the review states it plainly. If the source picture is thinner, the article focuses on the practical implication instead of filling the page with unsupported numbers. (Casino Guru source)

Reader question Useful check What changes the interpretation
Can a UK reader use it? Restricted-country wording and licence scope UK-restricted brands should be treated as informational research, not as UK options. (source context)
Is the bonus meaningful? Headline amount, wagering, max bet, expiry and restricted games (Casino Guru source) A large headline offer is weaker when the wagering or cashout terms are tight. (Casino Guru source)
Will withdrawals be predictable? Payment methods, processing window, limits, KYC documents and fee wording (Casino Guru source) Fast-looking banking is less useful when limits are low or document checks are unclear. (Casino Guru source)
How strong is the trust picture? Regulator trail, operator history, player-review samples and complaint handling (Anjouan licence source) Mixed or dated reputation signals should be read as risk context, not as a live guarantee.

How we verified this article

Licence holders and account numbers are checked against Anjouan licence source. Evidence dates follow the cited source records.

Operational status, country restrictions, bonus, banking, support and product claims are tied to operator-published pages or dated review-platform evidence rather than licence pages.

Frequently asked questions

No. This Lunar Bet review treats the brand as an offshore, closed crypto gambling site rather than a UK-licensed casino. The evidence names Caacon Ltd and Anjouan licensing claims, but the subject evidence also says Casino Guru records Lunar Bet as closed and no longer operating.

Reviewed by
Jon Yound, Bonus analyst at sitelikeuk
Bonus analyst

Jon Yound holds a PhD in mathematics and spent six years as a quantitative analyst before moving into iGaming. He joined sitelikeuk to answer one question properly: what is a casino bonus actually worth, once every clause in the terms is accounted for?

124
Reviews
8y
Experience